« it's not your fault | Main | It's still not the language's fault. »

Serious issues. So of course, Dildo reprints his AppleInsider article on his little "I blow Steve Jobs for candy" site, (he's still got factual errors in the stupid thing, even though after being slapped around, he finally did some research about what the MacBU is actually doing) and things being what they are, someone asks him about my...takedown. His response is a priceless bit of ad hominem:

John C. Welch’s Bynkii.com is a strange place. He fantasizes about raping women he finds “too stupid,” talks about “skull f*cking” people who he feels have made mistakes, and so on. It’s a really weird exposure of his angry and apparently sexually frustrated world.

Le Sigh. You write one article about flash-mob-bukakke, and you're fantasizing about raping women. I'm once again going to guess that people like George Carlin and Richard Pryor never existed in Dildo's world, because honestly, I'm kinda tame in comparison. But, if you use the right words with someone, you can get people to think all kinds of things. So, by allllmost accusing me of being a closet rapist, or what have you, (a closet skull-fucker? Did this idiot never see "Officer and a Gentleman"?). Of course, Dildo has to come up with a reason as to why I would say such things, (if you think of someone getting the vapors it helps). Since it can't just be for comedic effect, (what's that?), I must be sexually frustrated.

It's a great accusation. No, seriously, it's right up there with "are you still beating your wife". I don't know if there's a pithy latin phrase for it, but basically, if you accuse someone of it, there's no way for them to defend themselves. I mean, how do you prove such a thing? Nail a sorority in front of them? That just proves it more, obviously, if you weren't, you wouldn't need to do such a thing. The only thing you can do is kind of laugh, because it's also a 12-year old tactic. I'm surprised Dildo didn't pull "your mom's a whore" out too, it's at the same level, and about the same maturity level.

Also, having had Dildo get his vas in a twist about me more than once, he always, always, always, brings up violent sexual imagery for his ad hominems. Maybe Dildo's projecting just a wee bit? (I'll admit it, being immature sometimes is fun.)

Of all of the many trolls who have a problem with me, John C. Welch is the one I have the least interest in responding to. He apparently thinks he’s being funny, but in reality he just spends lots of time (it’s a lot of work to write paragraphs of text, check for grammar, etc) trying to run people down rather than correcting anything or actually printing anything of use to others. And he calls me the douche bag? Hilarious.

Of course. Dildo's never committed a technical, factual, error in one of his asinine posts. Nor has he ever defended technical, factual errors in any of his articles as being unimportant for n00bs.

Of course facts don't matter to Dildo. What he's running is a vaguely technical version of "The National Enquirer", and knows that his fanbase doesn't give a dead rat for facts. They just want moar MacMac! Hey, if it works, booyah, but don't get all butthurt when people point them out to you. Note: even if someone points out and proves a factual error in a rude fashion, they've still busted you in a mistake. Maybe you should try fact-checking more. (I know, I know, Dildo and facts.)

I hope he never has to go looking for work, because a potential employer who ran across his site would never hire him. Every sentence on his site is dripping with sexualized frustration and rage, written like a child molester psychopath with his balls nailed to the floor.

BRING OUT YOUR CONCERN TROLLS! BRING OUT YOUR CONCERN TROLLS!

Let's be clear here, Dildo is out and out lying in this one. The little weasel would love nothing better than if I were penniless and on the street. Oh, he might even say some nice words about "his poor family, suffering for his mistakes", but at the end of the day, he'd be in his mom's basement cackling with joy. It's okay Dildo, everyone loves schadenfruede. It's your dishonesty about it all that's lame.

As well, where the fuck does this idea that somehow, I hide this site from my employers come from? Because I don't. Every employer I've had since I started this site knows about it. In fact, (hold on to your tea towel Dildo, this one's gonna give you the vapors for sure), I want them to know about it. I don't like playing games with people, or surprising them. Surprises make for bad IT, and games suck. I don't specifically talk about my job here, but that's more because if I start using their name here on a regular basis, then disclaimer or no, this site becomes a de facto "spokessite" for them, and that's not the point of this site. I don't want it to be a "spokessite" for anything but my stream of consciousness at that moment. I also have a habit of not publicly criticizing people I work for. I do that in person like a grownup. I guess in Dildo's world, passive-aggressive rules uber alles.

What Dildo doesn't seem to get is that there are employers, (and I appreciate them all), who understand that their people are not clones, and may in fact have opinions they dislike. They may even express them in ways they don't like. That doesn't mean they aren't good people. It just means that sometimes, your IT guy is a fucking big-mouthed smartass. Whatever.

But again, did you see that imagery?

Every sentence on his site is dripping with sexualized frustration and rage, written like a child molester psychopath with his balls nailed to the floor.

Oh, and did you notice, he never addressed any of the actual errors I pointed out. Yeah, Dildo's like that.

Technorati Tags:
New Media Douchebags

Comments