« Oh lord, now the Exchange team is doing it | Main | Once a nimrod, always a nimrod »
While I am really glad that Adobe released a security patch for Flash, could someone...anyone please get them to STOP USING FRIGGIN' INSTALLER VISE? It makes *distributing* said patch a few orders of magnitude harder than it should be.
Oh wait, that's right, Adobe doesn't think Macs exist in more than groups of 5 in graphics departments.
Ow...I rolled my eyes too far, and they cramped.
Technorati Tags: Adobe, Adobe Flash, Bad Installers, TEH SUCK
Comments
Just a few years ago I called Adobe with a Photoshop problem and was told they did not support networked Macs. Period.
Seems not too much has changed ;-).
Posted by: Planeten Paultje | July 11, 2007 1:01 PM
Step 1: Convince MindVision to stop producing a Mac product.
Step 2: Delete all installations and installation media of Installer VISE
Step 3: Jesus returns
Basically, it ain't happening.
Posted by: pmbuko | July 11, 2007 1:21 PM
Dude, who cares about Exchange and Adobe?! Your catchphrase is now online at violentacres! w00t! Your famousness hath increaseth by 1!
Posted by: kernelman | July 12, 2007 4:13 AM
Roger that, even using JAMF Composer to re-package Adobe stuff it's still a nightmare...
Just broke a Design Suite install pushing out one measly Acrobat update!
My frustration overfloweth, violence will be performed!
Posted by: Dan | July 12, 2007 4:46 AM
Heh...I read VA religiously, so I knew about the catchphrase ;-)
Posted by: John C. Welch | July 12, 2007 10:37 AM
I agree 500% .... buy the adobe guy a Nuclear Waste at Dave's he might do it for u....
Posted by: Kernalpanx | July 12, 2007 11:11 AM
Off topic, but why on earth are the section heds on your right sidebar underlined when THEY'RE NOT LINKS!?
Underlined means LINK on the interwebs, try un-underlining and use bold.
Other than that, I love your rants, keep them coming!
Posted by: CAJ | July 12, 2007 3:19 PM
As do some others of us, but I read it almost completely through NNW. No comments, no point in clicking through.
Posted by: Arden | July 14, 2007 3:58 AM
CAJ:
Um, no, I like my layout the way it is. Underlining MUST ONLY BE LINK is only for people who haven't heard of recent developments. Like CSS.
or the 21st century.
Posted by: John C. Welch | July 14, 2007 10:20 AM
Hey John,
So, how DO you mark a link, if not by using underlining? Should we just, like, click-er-ama?
John
Posted by: JOhn | July 14, 2007 11:38 PM
JOhn, if yo read CAJ's complaint, it's that I use underlining OUTSIDE of linking, which, in his world Must Not Happen.
Bah.
As long as it's reasonably clear, I don't care HOW you identify them.
Posted by: John C. Welch | July 16, 2007 7:35 AM
